The 3-2-1 backup rule, and the restore test nobody runs
Three copies, two types of media, one off site: the rule is simple. But a backup is only worth something once you have successfully restored it.
Read the article →Data security
Passwords get stolen, guessed or lent. On accounts that can change a grade, confirm a payment or run payroll, a second check on the phone closes the door most often forced.
In most organisations, an account is protected by a single thing: its password. And passwords travel. They get written on a slip of paper under the keyboard, shared with a colleague "just for this week", reused on a personal email account, or typed into a computer at an internet café. Nobody needs to be a hacker to use one. They only need to have seen it once.
Two-factor authentication adds a second check that does not depend on the first. To get in, you need something you know (the password) and something you carry (your phone). Whoever read the password over someone's shoulder stays outside.
Not all accounts carry the same risk. An account that can only view a timetable exposes very little. An account that can change a grade, confirm a payment or alter a salary is another matter.
In all three cases, the damage rarely comes from a sophisticated attack. It comes from a legitimate account used by the wrong person. That is exactly what two-factor authentication makes hard.
The most common method uses an authenticator app on the phone. Several exist, free of charge, for Android and iPhone. When you switch it on, the platform shows a QR code. You scan it once with the app, and the link is made.
From then on, each time you log in, the app shows a six-digit code that changes every thirty seconds. You type your password, then the code. That is all.
Two points matter a great deal here:
Some platforms send the code by text message. That is better than nothing, but weaker: SMS depends on the network, sometimes arrives late, and a SIM card can be replaced or taken over by someone else. When an app is offered, use the app.
When you switch the feature on, the platform also gives you a short list of backup codes, each usable once. They are for the day the phone is lost, stolen or simply stops working.
Write them down or print them, then store them the way you would store a safe key: not on the phone, not in an email. Without them, a lost phone means going through an administrator to restore access. That is normal, but it takes time, usually at the worst possible moment.
"It slows people down." A few seconds per login. Many platforms can also remember a trusted computer for a set period, so the code is not requested every single time.
"Not all our staff have smartphones." Start with the people who hold sensitive rights. There are rarely many of them: a cashier, the payroll officer, an exam board secretary. The organisation can issue them a work phone.
"We trust each other here." Two-factor authentication protects honest staff too. It makes it far harder for someone else to act in their name, and when an operation is disputed, the login history becomes much more credible.
A password proves that someone knows a secret; two-factor authentication proves they are the person who was meant to know it.
If you would like to review the sensitive accounts on your platforms, or help your teams build good habits, we run IT security awareness sessions on your premises, in French. Get in touch.
Read next
Three copies, two types of media, one off site: the rule is simple. But a backup is only worth something once you have successfully restored it.
Read the article →Storing a Congolese institution's records abroad comes at a cost: foreign jurisdiction, slowness and reliance on the international link. Local hosting addresses all three.
Read the article →Handing student records to a provider does not hand over responsibility. Here is what an institution should demand, in writing, before signing anything.
Read the article →